P
PaperHouseastro theme ~
← All works

Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio?

Client
PaperHouse
Year
2026
Discipline
Comparison
Type
normal
Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio?

Astro vs Jekyll — for portfolios in 2026.

Both ship static HTML. Both are fast. Both are markdown-driven. So which one?

Jekyll — the veteran

  • Ruby-based, been around since 2008
  • Simple, stable, GitHub Pages native
  • Limited component model
  • Slower builds on large sites

Astro — the modern choice

  • Zero JS by default, islands architecture
  • Content Collections — type-safe, schema-validated
  • Component model — reuse across pages
  • Tailwind 4, TypeScript, MDX out of the box
  • Faster builds, better DX

For portfolios specifically

Astro wins. Content Collections enforce structure. Component reuse keeps design consistent. Islands give you interactivity where needed — forms, galleries, filters — without bloating the whole site.

Want to migrate from Jekyll?

I migrate Jekyll sites to Astro — preserving URLs, SEO, and content structure. Hire me on Fiverr for a Jekyll-to-Astro migration.

Get PaperHouse

Buy PaperHouse — $45 on Gumroad

Gallery
2 images
Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio? — 1
01Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio?
Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio? — 2
02Astro vs Jekyll — Which Is Right for Your Portfolio?